Rebuild the event sequence
Put alarms, machine states, and operator events in the order that led to the stop.
Reliabotix puts alarm history, work orders, manuals, and past fixes in one incident view, so maintenance can see what happened before the stop and start with what the plant already knows.
Built for packaging, controls, and plant teams dealing with repeat faults and limited expert coverage.
WHY REPEAT FAULTS TAKE TOO LONG
Alarm history lives in one system. Work orders live in another. The manual is somewhere else, and the technician who remembers the last fix may be on another shift. That is why a known problem can still take hours to diagnose.
Reliabotix gives the next responder the sequence, the prior fix, and the source behind it.
Built by founders with firsthand experience troubleshooting packaging automation and supporting maintenance and controls teams in production environments.
Put alarms, machine states, and operator events in the order that led to the stop.
Compare the sequence with past incidents, approved manuals, and fixes technicians have verified.
Record the physical cause, corrective action, source, and technician verification for the next shift.
ONE INCIDENT · FOUR QUESTIONS
See repeat occurrences, handoffs, and whether the last verified fix is reaching every shift.
Review ordered controller events, machine states, past incidents, and approved technical references.
Tie each occurrence to the line, duration, and response history before approving corrective work.
One fixed-price pilot, one recurring fault, named deliverables, an agreed baseline, and a final review.
THE INCIDENT VIEW
Representative product experience using demonstration data.
FANUC M-410iC · Line 2 Palletizing
RECONSTRUCTED SEQUENCE
HOW THE PILOT IS MEASURED
Before work begins, maintenance and finance document how the fault is handled today. The pilot is reviewed against those same measures. Reliabotix does not publish made-up ROI percentages.
Compare how long it takes the team to reach a documented diagnosis.
Track when the same fault is handed to controls, engineering, or an outside vendor.
Record when a verified resolution helps another technician diagnose the same fault.
Check whether each incident closes with the source and technician verification attached.
THE FIRST PURCHASE
The first PO is limited to a recurring fault that your team already knows costs time. Scope, required records, measures, data limits, and deliverables are written down before work starts. Pricing and diligence are handled privately.
Maintenance and finance record the fault frequency, diagnostic time, escalations, and approved cost inputs.
Use agreed records and read-only inputs. Complete the named deliverables without touching machine controls.
Compare the result with the current state and decide whether another use case is justified.
Savings are only calculated from plant-approved production and labor inputs. We do not count the same downtime twice.
FIXED-PRICE PILOT
Tell us about one recurring packaging, conveying, or robot-cell fault. We review the available records with you. If the problem is a good fit, we provide a fixed-price pilot proposal that maintenance and finance can evaluate.
Review a recurring faultChoose one repeat fault on one line where troubleshooting time is already a known problem.
Agree which alarm exports, work orders, manuals, and site procedures can be used.
Record the current diagnosis path, escalations, and closeout process before work begins.
Compare the pilot with the baseline and agree whether another use case is justified.
If there is a fit, your team receives the full scope, data requirements, security information, and price directly.
WHAT YOU CAN SHARE FIRST
A first review does not require a live connection or confidential production data. We only need enough information to understand the fault and the records available.
Start with permitted alarm exports, work order history, and manuals. Do not place confidential plant data in the public inquiry form.
First confirm that the recurring fault, available records, and current response make sense for a pilot.
Architecture, deployment, integration mapping, security documents, pricing, and roadmap details are shared directly.
If the pilot moves forward, we review identity and access, retention and deletion, audit and export needs, integration limits, and security documents with the right stakeholders.
BUILT FOR MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
Reliabotix does not send commands to PLCs, robots, drives, or safety systems.
Every recommendation points to an approved manual, site procedure, or technician-verified resolution.
Technicians verify the cause and follow the site's LOTO and maintenance procedures.
COMMON QUESTIONS
No. Reliabotix is read-only by design. It reconstructs incidents from approved data sources and never writes to PLCs, robots, drives, safety systems, or other controllers.
TELL US ABOUT ONE RECURRING FAULT
Give us the equipment, alarm or symptom, how often it happens, and how your team handles it today. We will tell you whether it is a good fit for a pilot and what we would need next.
Fault and line · records required · current baseline · deliverables · data limits · price